leaving the usa

I heard this Schiller thing mentioned on one of my political sites, didn't  seem much like a deal.  I guess the website of People magazine is quite an authority, but nothing I have read indicates that Trump has any kind of emotional anchor (emotional anchor?), and indeed the quantum foam is bad enough without the mind-shattering concept of Trump having anything close to a friend.  I simply choose not to believe it.

One would think legality is a simple thing, but why do we have all those lawyers then?  I understand that DACA was on shaky legal ground and that a bunch of Texans were threatening to fight  it in court.  How shaky the legal grounds are I don't  know.  Trump could have had the Justice Dept fight for it, but rumor has it that Sessions wouldn't do it, which I don't know, hard to imagine Sessions not  doing Tump's bidding, and even if he wouldn't, Trump doesn't have any problem firing people.  Well he is very bad about  the process but he does get it done.

This whole idea of this is the law and obeying it is the most important thing has always seemed to me to be an argument cited when the law is something the citer likes, but when the law goes counter to what the citer wants, not so much.  If the law was confiscating Old Betsy from the Freehold would Beagles be patting Trump on the back for enforcing it?

And then there is the matter of expelling 800,000 people living here and keeping their noses clean and going to school or working or serving in the army, to a country some know nothing about and can't even speak the language.  Legality aside, is that a good idea?

And then does anyone believe that congress is going to pass some kind of bill about this in six months?  Sure, and Trump has an emotional anchor, hell, has a ballroom full of people who all think he is the greatest friend their ever was.  A simple bill, what they call a clean bill, with just this issue on it, would probably pass with all dems for it and enough reps to make up the difference.

But such a bill, a clean bill, will never come to pass.  The will of the majority has become passe.  What rules now (since pedophile Danny Hastert I believe) is the majority of the majority.  If the majority of the reps don't like a bill it never gets to the floor.  Here comes the Freedom Caucus, who will attach the wall to the bill and nothing will pass and six months later, my guess is Trump will extend it again as he has said he might, but  then he says so many things.

I see where Mitch and Paul, who sometimes show a little bit  of sense, are jumping on this bill like that guy at the end of Dr Strangelove jumping on that bomb over Moscow.  Yshoo.

But it's good to see that Beagles has outlined another plan and posted it on the influential Beaglestonian so that should shut up Kim III for a bit.

I am a little disappointed at Beagles' reaction to his hypothetical wife.  I've stated before that the main purpose of a hypothetical wife is to tell you that your latest idea is a bunch of tomfoolery so you can drop it and take up some other tomfool idea.  What if we gave hurricanes dogs' names?