I stumbled across this information one evening on Wikipedia and found the concept interesting. I have read a number of times that consumer spending represents 70% of all the economic activity in the US. It would seem, then, that the more money there is in consumers' hands, the better the economy should function, kind of a "trickle up" theory. Maybe the reason the idea never took off in Canada was that they put the word "social" in it. If you think about it, this would be more like capitalism than socialism because we would all be stockholders in all the nation's corporations. I don't know why the corporate people wouldn't go for this, but they never did. I mean, all the money they paid out in dividends would eventually trickle right back up to them. What's not to like?
Of course this has nothing to do with what those goofy Red Chinese are doing. The blame for that goes to Richard Nixon, who embraced the Red Chinese at the expense of our loyal allies in Taiwan. I said at the time that no good would come of that, and it certainly hasn't.
In the early days of the Institute, Uncle Ken and I tried without success to adjust the type size without much luck.
I just checked now, and they offer some different options than they used to.
I don't know if I like these any better than the options they used to offer.
It seems they still offer the old options, one being too smalland the other too big.
As far as color,
What's wrong
with plain old black?
No comments:
Post a Comment