That's not from memory, that's from some book you read or some other
source it sounds like you picked up some years ago. If you had read
a different book or material, you might have said something
different. That's why it's so important to know where you got your
information. Myself I got my information from a book that has
powerfully influenced my thinking, The Nurture Assumption by Judy Harris, though I
admit that I haven't taken the time to look up where in the book it
presents this information about young tribal messages.
Or you could do what we usually do which is go to the wiki. It
would take some mucking around because it's kind of a complex thing
to look up, not a name, but a sentence, something like 'child
rearing in hunter gatherer societies.' There, I could copy and
paste that right now, but like you, I am presently pressed for
time. I have two things on my agenda for today, and you know, as a
retiree, that makes for a very packed day.
But having said all that, I agree essentially with what you said and
i don't think it's much different from what I have been saying. The
important part of that is how kids have that adolescent period (12
to 20 sound like good bracketing years, though it could begin a
little earlier or later and likewise end earlier or later.), where
kids' society consists mostly of other kids and where cool reigns
supreme. One could observe it by just looking at the people around
them, or go back to their own memories.
Except maybe Beagles can't. He seems to be a guy who is immune from
cool, who has to ask what it is and therefore can never understand
what it is. You were in ROTC for Chrissake, I don't think anything,
including the slide rule club, was uncooler than ROTC. But you did
seem to sense that something was going on, you certainly sensed that
the girls liked the cool guys, or maybe it was that the girls who
liked the cool guys were more, ahem, accessible than the other
girls. You have made some mention about your forays into the world
of cool to get girls, but you haven't given many details about them
and I gather that they weren't very successful.
But maybe i was worse because I spent way more time trying to be
cool than you did, and I had no success whatsoever, I believe I had
five dates, none of which were consummated by a kiss goodnight.
I did plug that phrase":'child
rearing in hunter gatherer societies.' into the google machine,
but it was all like advice on how to raise babies, and the idea was
generally to raise them like the hunter gatherers did, who they
basically viewed as noble savages and had their own claims as to how the
hunter gatherers did it, which they interpreted to enforce their own
theories about raising kids.
That's the trouble with the internet, you use it to find information but
then you are greeted by a bunch of salesmen. And the whole idea that
our forebears did things in some natural way that we
should emulate is so much crap. They may have been noble (which I
wouldn't bet the farm on), but they were also savages.
Okay I was going to go on about cool a little more here, but the hour is
getting late, so I'm just going to make a little comment. How about in
most of our movies and our literature the guy we root for is the rebel
and never the authority figure, and even when the hero is a cop, he is a
rebel cop? Because that's what's cool, a little bit of rebellion.
No comments:
Post a Comment