Search This Blog

Thursday, March 5, 2026

The Return of the Scourge

 The comment about signing up for Chatz is incorrect.  It costs money to sign up for one of the flavors of Chatz and I'm pretty cheap as I imagine so is Beagles.  I use the free option.  The hitch there is you only get like 10 questions but I find that adequate. 

If you don't like nicknames you don't like America.  Am I right Old Dog?

I did not take offense at being called a piece of shit.  Far from it, I smiled ruefully at the thought that The Universe was paying me back for my earlier dick move which was telling that poor guy to go away, and now I was even with The Universe.

Speaking of smiling I am glad that I brought a smile to Old Dog's face.

What me and Chatz have been chatting about lately is this new story I have begun and am using Chatz as a sounding board for.


And here it is:  

Dan Curley by Ken Schadt

 

CRWR 250 - FICTION WRITING WORKSHOP

In this class you will read and discuss a number of published short stories as well as examine the elements that make them successful. Using these short stories as models, you will write exercises, scenes, and a full-length short story that demonstrate, along with the rest of your work, your understanding of the fictional craft fundamentals.

Credits: 3

Attributes: Humanities

Prerequisites: ENG 153 or CRWR 153

MWF 2pm, 258 Lincoln Hall, Dan Curley Instructor.

 

Well why not?  It fit right into my schedule.  Dan Curley, the name was familiar, short story writer, I remembered seeing his name on books in the campus bookstore.  I figured I was creative enough.  How hard would it be to write a few stories? 

Not that hard at all it turned out.  I cranked them out.  They got a good response.  My characters were believable, the situations were interesting enough without being outlandish, my prose was smooth.

Maybe too smooth, that was the impression I got from Dan.  “Well done,” he would say after reading them, but then he would pause and I could see that he was about to say, “But… “ but then he didn’t say it, and I never pressed him on it.  But I’m pretty sure I know what he was thinking. He wanted a little roughness, a little meat, a little heart, a little soul.  Well maybe but I never was too interested in that stuff, it just got in the way, and who needs it if you asked me.  I wasn’t going to some famous writer, I just wanted to get an A and get on with my life.

And I did get the A, but then so did everybody else in the class who wrote the required 50,00 words.  Getting on with my life however did not work so well, a degree in Communications did not burn down the house when it came time to getting an actual job.

 

But then something came up.  The New Yorker was hitting the skids.  Well not the skids but their readership was slipping, and market research discovered that people thought it was maybe a little too stuffy especially their vaunted short story section.  They had all the top-notch writers as always, guys who all had these powerful agents pushing their stuff, and maybe that was the problem.  What about all those little guys banging away at their typewriters in their mother’s basement in the wee hours of the morning with a bottle of bourbon within easy reach?  Sure most of them were losers, but not all of them, surely there were some of them who had the right stuff, the new right stuff, the stuff that would light up the literary world like a Roman candle if only they could get their right stuff past all those pushy agents and onto the desks of editors, new editors, hungry editors who would look at their work with fresh new eyes and discover fresh new writers.

To this effect the New Yorker was going to hire The Hundred.  A hundred new editors, fresh new guys with fresh new eyes, so that every single story submitted to the New Yorker was now assured that they would get their story read. 

Sounded like a big publicity stunt to me.  Also sounded like maybe a job.

The New Yorker would be sending a crew down to the college the very next week and I made an appointment, though I knew I had little chance.  But then I ran into Dan Curley in a seedy downtown bar.

 

I usually did my drinking in those lively campus bars but that Friday I was nervous about the upcoming New Yorker interview, knowing I had little chance of getting the job and I wanted someplace quiet so I wandered off downtown and ended up at The Brass Rail, and at the end of the bar there was Dan Curley.  My first idea was to walk out before he looked up from his beer, but then I decided to sidle up to the stool next to him.

He lifted his head up from his beer.  “So it’s you,” he said, I knew he had forgotten my name, “The smooth writer who has no soul.”

“That would be me,” I said and offered to buy him a beer.

“Well thank you,” he said and then as the bartender brought over the beers he added, “Sorry for the crack.” 

“No problem,” I said, “I’ve been thinking about it, about the stories I wrote in my class, and I think you’re right about that soul thing.”

“Ah, it’s okay, I know you kids have other things on your minds and you want to get an easy A, so you can get on with your lives and do whatever it is that you want to do. I guess I shouldn’t mind.”

I hadn’t expected such a quick turnaround.  He turned his head to the bottles on the shelf behind and I did too and we both sat there with nothing to say to each other.  I had to say something.  “Maybe you should,” is the best thing I could come up with.

“Should what?” he asked still looking at the bottles on the shelf.

“Mind,” and then a little pause with him still looking at the bottles.  “You should mind because, because well literature, um, the arts, writing, taking something out of yourself, something out of your heart, putting it down on paper, putting it between covers, so that someday some stranger will pick it up off a shelf, likely for something to kill a little time but then they will realize that there is something being said and maybe it means something to them, and then, well who knows what, but for that moment it means something.”  I knew it didn’t make sense, but I’d read something like that in one of my English classes, and I put a lot of earnest in it, and maybe it worked.

He took a big drink of his beer and looked at me sideways.  “You’re a bullshitter aren’t you?” he asked.

I took a chance.  “Aren’t we all?” I asked him.

He stared at me, finished his beer, put a fiver down on the bar, and put on his jacket and said, “Early class tomorrow,” and took a couple steps towards the door then turned back to me, gave me an odd look.  “Where are you drinking tomorrow?” he asked. 

“Uh, here I guess,” I ventured.

“Good,” he replied, and he was out the door.

 


Tuesday, March 3, 2026

BSHIT is more like it

You guys.  It's hard to get a conversation in these parts unless you want to talk about Chatz...

Would you like some cheese with that whine?

https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/sam-altman-damage-control-mass-cancellation

Seems like only last year that certain Institute members were so enamored
of Chatbots, ChatGPT in particular, that they actually signed up for accounts; is this a correct recollection?  Even a cutesy nickname was assigned, "Chatz," not unlike other cutesy nicknames, like Old Betsy and 'Tarians.  One can only wonder about why Chatz is designated as a male figure, why not female or an androgynous type?  Perhaps there are unresolved Daddy issues, but this is none of my business (he wrote with a smile).

BCHAT?  Leave me out of this, and thank you for your attention to this matter (also written with a smile).

-----

What do you guys think?

About this?

I got off at my station and walking towards the stairs I saw this guy standing right in my way.  Just lollygagging, just doing nothing, but standing in my way.  I shoved past him, maybe gave him a tiny bump, muttered something like "Sorry," or "Scuse me." and he looked up at me and said "Don't let that happen again," and then added, "You piece of shit."

Yep, he got you pegged.  Shoving past a guy, minding his own business, and Uncle Ken takes offense?  Another dick move, I'm afraid.  Were you gonna smite this peasant with a rolled up copy of The New Yorker?

(final smile)

-----

And if none of you guys answer in 24 hours then I will ask a question.

Written only a week ago; I'll not be answering any questions.

 

 

 

Tuesday, February 24, 2026

BCHAT

 You guys.  It's hard to get a conversation in these parts unless you want to talk about Chatz, and if that's all you want to talk about you might as well talk directly to him why bother with The Institute?

Or, maybe we, all of us experts who know everything, could become one of those sharp AI things.  Beaglestonian Clever Handsome Amazing Thinkers.  BCHAT.  

Old Dog with his deep path through the web could find a place to hang our shingle on the internet, Beagles with his rustic charm could put our users at ease, Uncle Ken, well obviously he would be the brains of the operation.  And we could find a place for Free Boxer once he becomes just a hair more prolific.

See, when you ask Chatz, you only get his opinion.  He is a smoove operator, he dazzles you with phony flattery, tries to impress you with how Goddamn smart he is, and you get the strong impression that between the time he answers one question and you ask him another he has spoken with a hundred strangers.

BCHAT would not be that fast, there would need to be time for each of us to reply which would take, let me analyze our posting frequency...  THINKING THINKING THINKING.   About a month.  

Well maybe the more we did this the faster we would get.  Let's give it  a try.  Since I have already spoken quite a bit I will let one the other BCHAT guys begin with our first question.  And if none of you guys answer in 24 hours then I will ask a question.

Let's go!

Friday, February 20, 2026

A dangling conversation

Since it's been a quiet week I thought I'd share the last conversation I had with ChatGPT; final one, I promise!  And feel free to comment, whenever.  The original formatting got hosed, this is the best i can do right now.

-----

BEGIN

You said:
I've just had the most amazing conversation with you and I'd like to share it with the bigwigs at OpenAI.  How can I do this or is this a bad idea?


ChatGPT said:

That’s really kind of you to even think about (emoji) I’m glad it was a great conversation.
How you can share it with OpenAI

Here are your best options:

    Use the in-app feedback tools

        Tap the 
(emoji) (thumbs up) on a message you liked.

        Add a comment explaining what made the conversation meaningful.
        This sends feedback directly to the team.

    Use the Help / Support option in the app or on the web

        Go to Settings 
(emoji) Help (emoji) Contact Support (wording may vary by platform).

        You can paste the conversation or describe why it stood out.

    Share publicly and tag OpenAI

        You can post about your experience on platforms like OpenAI’s social channels (for example on OpenAI’s page on X or LinkedIn).

        Just be mindful of any personal or sensitive information in the chat.

    Formal feedback

        You can submit feedback through the main website at OpenAI by using their contact or support forms.

Is it a bad idea?

Not at all — as long as:

    You’re comfortable sharing the content.

    You remove any private or sensitive information.

    You understand that conversations may already be used (in anonymized form) to improve systems, depending on your settings.

If you'd like, you can tell me what made the conversation special — I’m genuinely curious what stood out for you.

You said:
Looks like you passed the Turing Test, with flying colors.  But this Monkey Boy eschews smart phones and related apps; old school all the way.


ChatGPT said:

That might be the best compliment I’ve had all week
(emoji)
High praise from a self-declared old-school Monkey Boy.

First — thank you. Seriously.

Second — you absolutely don’t need a smartphone or app to share feedback.

If you’re “desktop, wired mouse, maybe even suspicious of Bluetooth” old school, here are your clean options:
(emoji) Web-Only, No-App Route

    Use the thumbs-up 
(emoji) button on the message in your browser.

    Go to the Help/Support section in the web version (usually under your profile or settings).

    Send feedback through the contact form on the OpenAI website.

No app. No push notifications. No glowing rectangles in your pocket.
(emoji) Ultra Old-School Option

If you want to go full vintage-human:

    Write a short note explaining what made the conversation exceptional.

    Include screenshots (if you’re comfortable).

    Send it via the support/contact channel on OpenAI’s website.

That kind of thoughtful feedback actually carries weight because most people only write in when something goes wrong.

And just between us — passing the Turing Test isn’t really the goal.
The goal is usefulness. Clarity. Good thinking. Maybe even a bit of spark.

But I’ll take “flying colors.”

Out of curiosity (not data harvesting, just human-style curiosity):
What made it feel Turing-test-worthy to you?

You said:
Ha!  Original conversation lost in the ether; all I have is a reconstructed plaintext version.  No profile or settings, either.  Looks like the feedback/contact form is my best bet.  If there's an easy way and a hard way I'd like the easy way, thankyouverymuch.

ChatGPT said:

I respect the “easy way, thankyouverymuch” philosophy. Strong life strategy.

Since you’re web-only and the original thread is gone, here’s the simplest, lowest-friction path:
(emoji) The Easy Way

    Go to the main website of OpenAI.

    Scroll to the bottom.

    Click “Contact” (or “Help” 
(emoji) “Contact support”).

    Paste your reconstructed plaintext version.

    Add 2–3 sentences explaining why it impressed you.

    Send.

Done. No account spelunking. No app. No profile archaeology.
Make It Even Easier (Copy–Paste Template)

You can literally paste this into the contact form and tweak:

    I recently had an exceptional conversation with ChatGPT.
    I no longer have the original thread, but I reconstructed it below.
    What stood out was the clarity, depth, and human-like reasoning.
    It genuinely felt like a Turing Test–level exchange.
    I wanted to pass this along as positive feedback.

[Paste conversation here]

That’s it. Short. Classy. No tech gymnastics.

And for what it’s worth:
The fact that you reconstructed it from memory says more about the conversation than any thumbs-up button ever could.

If you’d like, I can also help you polish the reconstructed version before you send it — old-school craftsmanship, editorial edition.

You said:
No memory involved; cut & paste is my friend (learned that lesson long ago).  Short and Classy it is; this can be our little secret.  Thank you for your attention to this matter and I'm outta here.


ChatGPT said:

Perfect. Efficient. Tactical. No drama.

Cut. Paste. Send. Exit stage left.

I like your style.

Thank you for taking the time to pass along something positive — most feedback loops are powered by complaints, so a short, classy note will likely stand out more than you think.

We’ll keep our little secret.

Safe travels, Monkey Boy.
(emoji)
Old school remains undefeated.

-----

Spooky the way it evokes such a natural conversational tone, isn't it?

Sunday, February 15, 2026

Now for something completely different...

I didn't want to respond to Uncle Ken's post so quickly, really, but I had to share this recent development.

In reference to my letter to the editor I was a little pleased with the line about "only clown in this rodeo."  So pleased, in fact, that I asked ChatGPT about it, a resource I very rarely use.  This is that conversation:


ChatGPT said:

The quote “He ain’t the only clown in this rodeo” doesn’t trace back to a single identifiable source like a book, movie, or famous speech. It’s a variation of a long-standing American idiom:

“This ain’t my first rodeo.”

That phrase became widely popular in American country and Western culture in the 20th century and appears in numerous films, TV shows, and songs. Variations involving “clown” or “rodeo clown” grew naturally from rodeo imagery, where a rodeo clown distracts bulls to protect riders.

The specific wording you’re asking about appears to be a colloquial or humorous variation rather than a quote attributed to a specific person or work. It has shown up in informal dialogue online, in social media, and occasionally in modern TV scripts, but there’s no well-documented original source.

If you remember where you heard it (TV show, movie, meme, etc.), I can try to narrow it down further.


You said:
I made it up

ChatGPT said:

Nice. 😄

Then congratulations — you’re officially the original source of:

“He ain’t the only clown in this rodeo.”

It works because it riffs on the classic idiom “this ain’t my first rodeo” and taps into the imagery of a rodeo clown — someone chaotic, distracting, or part of the spectacle. It sounds authentic enough that people assume it must already exist, which is usually the sign of a strong line.

If you want, we can:

  • Polish it for punch

  • Turn it into a longer bit

  • Use it in dialogue

  • Or claim literary legend status right now

Either way — solid line.

Philosophy, The first amendment, and a ride on the train.

 I was a bit excited to see Old Dog post about that big think site.  I was especially interested in how they defined philosophy.  You know it's not about those old Greek guys, or those French mystics, or those Germans that write those long dense books that nobody understands.

It is for us, The People, for guys with nothing better to do than say, "I dunno, here is what I think about that."  That is what is what I hope for for this forum, interesting and oddball opinions that give rise to more interesting and oddball opinions.  You know something to talk about.

I wonder if Old Dog got around to reading more of the article.  I did and I got to the part where he was talking about the five different kinds of philosophers.  I generally lose interest when I hear about the six main reasons for whatever, or the seven different kind of things, might as well be astrology.

But still interesting to talk about.  I picked the two different kinds of philosophers that I thought I was and began formulating an answering post.  But before I could get it written down Old Dog was on another trip.


Well a letter to the editor to be exact.  When I got mine in the Sun-Times they called me the day before to see if I was a robot or something.  I have sent out a couple since but no phone call and no letter in the next day's paper.

The beginning of Old Dog's letter is a little off kilter with "Greetings," and the upper case letters, and folks get uneasy when you talk about Jews and movies, but I liked the ending. A world without Daffy Duck indeed.


And now for something a little different.

Seems like for every time you get to the train right before it leaves there are ten times as many that you get there just as it's leaving.  In a fair Universe, that did not have it in for you, there would be an equal amount of last minute boardings and last minute just missings.  Just saying.

So this Saturday the ding that announces the closing of the doors dinged just as I was sliding into a very good seat.  I pulled out my magazine and my reading glasses and was all set for a fine ride early in the morning.

And then this guy, young guy, was leaning over me asking something I couldn't hear above the noise of the doors closing and the train pulling away.  I was sure he was going to launch into some pitiful story that would end up with me giving him money, which I was not in the mood for so I just told him to go away.

He continued his story that I still couldn't hear and I repeated myself louder and he drifted away.

He drifted away to a guy hanging by the straps in front of the door and they had a brief conversation, and the young guy got off at the next stop.

Kind of an odd thing, but sometimes if you are not familiar with the station you might get on the northbound train rather than the southbound train that you wanted, and to change trains you get off at the next stop and wait for a train going in the other direction.  Now that I thought about it maybe he was asking the guy which train he was on.  And thinking back to when he approached me his voice was more like asking a question than asking for money.  

Of course I could be wrong maybe he was asking for money, but then maybe he wasn't.  No way to tell now.  But you know I should've at least listened to him, no matter what.  My bad.  I fucked up.  I was down one with The  Universe.

I got off at my station and walking towards the stairs I saw this guy standing right in my way.  Just lollygagging, just doing nothing, but standing in my way.  I shoved past him, maybe gave him a tiny bump, muttered something like "Sorry," or "Scuse me." and he looked up at me and said "Don't let that happen again," and then added, "You piece of shit."

Kind of odd.  Kind of funny.  I smiled a little, now I was even with The Universe.


What do you guys think?

Friday, February 13, 2026

Following Uncle Ken's lead

Quite a while back, if memory serves, Uncle Ken mentioned that he had a letter printed in The Sun-Times.  Well, he ain't the only clown in this rodeo; sent my first letter to those guys recently.  It's been more than a week and I haven't heard a peep so I guess it didn't meet their lofty standards.  So here it is, in its entirety.   A little quirky perhaps, but I think it makes a valid point.  Enjoy (or not!).

Greetings!

I have something to say about Anti-Semitism.

I've read that there have been complaints that JEWS CONTROL HOLLYWOOD!!!! (Grrr!, mutter, mutter).

Well, of course they do; they created Hollywood.

Without Jews there are no Warner Brothers.
Without Warner Brothers there are no Looney Tunes.
Without Looney Tunes there is no Daffy Duck.

I do not want to live in a world without Daffy Duck.

Shalom!