Cedric? Wherever did Beagles get that idea? But you know me, I am a
relentless searcher after the truth, and unlike some of us here on the
blog, I don't hew to beliefs that I carved into stone when I was in my
mid-twenties, so I was off to the google, and I typed in ce and Cecil
the Lion popped right up in the suggestions. I might at this point,
have pointed out, that had I indeed been wrong about the name of the
late king of beasts, and not bothered to check up on it because I
thought that the guy thinking that it was Cedric was a member of that
thoughtless tribe of tea partiers, and therefore didn't know shit, why
then I would have continued to be wrong.
The skinny on the death of Cecil is that the dentist was paying guides
who dragged a carcass behind their jeep to tempt Cecil off the protected
reservation where the dentist shot him with an arrow which didn't kill
him so they tracked him down and shot him to death. I don't know who
administered the final shots.
Last I heard the dentist claimed he didn't know he was breaking any
laws. It sounds a little hard to believe, dragging a carcass and all
that he didn't, but say he didn't. Say as a matter of fact he was doing
it legally. I am sure there is some legal way to do it, by paying a
lot of money which will go towards preservation of African wildlife, and
I guess that is alright if it results in there being more big wildlife
than there would be otherwise.
But I wonder what is going through the heads of these big game hunters.
They certainly aren't going to eat what they kill, and they certainly
aren't restoring any balance of nature because all these animals are
endangered, and they are certainly not doing anything bold because they
travel with an armed guard, and they are certainly not displaying any
tracking skills because their armed guard is leading them to the prey
and pointing out to them where to shoot.
So all they are really doing is putting a bullet or an arrow into the
heart of some big beast and ending its life, not much different than a
firing squad, except that with the firing squad the victim is often
guilty of something.
So that's it. I'm not necessarily saying they should arrest the guy or
anything. I'm just saying there is something wrong with him. And maybe
I am being a little irrational here. Right now in my own home town I
am sure that somebody is murdering someone else, most likely for no very
good reason, and though I certainly think it's wrong, and hope the
miscreant faces due justice, I am not getting all worked up about it. I
guess it's two things and one of them is that city slicker notion of
animals being basically innocent, not having bitten of the apple maybe
(though of course I don't believe that, I am just being literary), and
people generally are not innocent for very long. The other thing is
maybe just the way they pose with their dead prey, like ain't they
something. Just sticks in my craw is all.
Speaking of being irrational, let's go to your aversion against gays.
Myself, the shining liberal in the tower in the big city, I always wince
in movies when they have a couple gay guys kissing. Yuck. But there
it is, in a way we can't control our emotions, sometimes somebody just
pisses us off, but you can control your actions, you don't need to punch
the guy. So likeways with the gays, maybe you shudder at their
perverted lust, nothing to be done about that, but say somewhere down
the line you get to cast your vote for or against gay marriage, here is
something you can control. I'm not going to make the argument here, but
say you had a logical debate about gay marriage, say on some famous
blog, and at the end you realized that legalizing gay marriage would
make for a more stable nation and generally happier people all around,
then wouldn't you, as a good citizen, have to cast your vote in favor of
it?
Sort of like I despise those big game hunter types, but it they wanted
to put up a big game park somewhere in the state, and the net result
would be that even though some magnificent animals would end up with
their heads on some jagoff's wall, more would get to romp and stomp and
generally look magnificent if we allowed the park than if we didn't,
well I would have to vote for that big game park.
No comments:
Post a Comment