Well that whole jeans controversy is a lot more nuanced than I thought.
So who composed this student council? Was it like one student from
each grade, each classroom? How were they chosen? Did each classroom
or grade vote their own representative? How did you get nominated?
What was your platform?
Was this a binding vote or just a resolution with no teeth? What were
the circumstances of the vote? Was their clearly a majority after the
ayes had expressed their opinion? How can you know that other council
members opposed the issue? You know politicians, they will always act
like they agree with you. What was the nature of your being out of
order all through the meeting? Maybe you're lucky you didn't have to
stand in a corner for the rest of the semester.
And don't tell me what Ezekiel had to say about voice votes. I don't
think I talk that much about religion. I talk about morality a lot, but
it's mostly in philosophic manner. I talk about the institutions of
religion sometimes, and I certainly want to talk about the St Nicholas,
but I don't see much biblical relevance to any of that. Well i don't
know, it just seems to me that we are talking about something
philosophical and the next thing I know we are deep in biblical weeds
and I am at a loss to understand how this has anything more to do with
what we are talking about than the latest Cubs box score.
Remember Madalyn Murray O'Hare? She won a case in the supreme court to
eliminate bible reading in public schools in 1963, and founded something
called American Atheists, and just generally raised hell against
religion for about thirty years. She was a wretched person, I saw her
on tv a couple times and it seems like mainly she liked to argue, and in
that Donald Trump manner where she just called everybody who disagreed
with her idiots and never really responded to questions she didn't want
to answer. She never wrote much, but sometimes I wish she had so that I
could go on and on talking about her writings whenever somebody started
talking the bible to me.
So anyway I keep wanting to get back to 1957 in Gage Park, and how it
seemed like there was a powerful force to not be different, to not make
trouble. We were all well-fed, well-housed, and though a lot of our
education sounded like propaganda they did teach us math and reading
well enough. You know I hated all that authority that the school held
over us, but anymore I don't mind it so much. We were really too young
to do much thinking, and probably it's best to do your thinking when you
get out of school when you can choose your own books and you're not
dependent on getting some grade.
You know the author, Ehrenhalt, expresses nostalgia for that time, and
even though I would hate to go back there, I feel it a little bit.
Maybe we were better off somehow believing in something, even if it was
wrong, then the way it is now.
Well that's all pretty vague, but I am going to ask you what do you think?
No comments:
Post a Comment