So you support gun control because you don't want to get shot. How many times have you been shot at in your life? Do you personally know anybody who has gotten shot, or even shot at? How many times have you seen somebody walking down Michigan Avenue toting a gun? Let's face it, the only things you know about guns are what you have read or seen on television. Of course, you could say the same thing about my knowledge of gays. I have met a few gay people in my life, and I never had any problem with them. Well, there was that one guy in the army, but he backed off as soon as he saw that I was prepared to do whatever was necessary to stop him. He was really drunk at the time, and I suppose he mistook me for one of his own. Anyway, I have said before that I think you just don't like the idea of guns, as I don't like the idea of people being gay. You denied it then, and I suppose you will deny it now. Nevertheless, I maintain that, if both guns and gays could be kept out of the news media, neither of us would be bothered by either one of them, but that would be censorship and we can't have that in the United States of America.
I guess I pulled that statement about the companies making the best products being the companies that made the most money out of my ass. I don't have any evidence to support it at my finger tips. Do you have any evidence to support your assertion that it's not true? It would seem to be common sense to me, but the world doesn't always run on common sense, does it. The example of General Motors comes to mind. They made the best cars in the world for decades, and used to be the largest and most successful company on Earth. Then, one day, they showed up on Uncle Sam's door with their hand out begging for alms. Some time later, they went bankrupt, weaseled out of their debts, and continued operating. Last I heard they were recalling everything they had made in the last 20 years for safety issues. How could anybody screw up a company like General Motors? They must done it on purpose and tried really hard. And you say there ain't no conspiracies!
I think all that big suck and radical stuff at he paper mill was just name calling social crap like they had in school. Apparently you look back on those days fondly, but I don't. The only reason I put up with it was that I thought it might help me get laid, but it never did. When I finally did start getting laid, it was because I had learned how to evade the social crap and get right down to the business at hand. When I was a kid, all I could think about was growing up and getting away from those people. Then, years later, I found that they had followed me all the way to God's Country. Well, not the same people, but the same kinds of people, which is pretty much the same thing. What is there besides social crap? Well, there's getting laid, earning a living, getting married, raising a kid or two, owning a car and a house, preferably with some land around it, hunting, fishing, gardening, cutting and burning firewood, maybe raising some dogs and a few chickens, you know....having a real life.
I found an article on Wiki titled "Children's Migration Crisis", which summed up the current border trouble pretty well. Then, I clicked onto one of their sources, a recent article from the New York Times, which went into more detail. The times article had a "comments" section, which they said was now closed, but I read a number of the comments that had already been posted. Amidst the usual partisan rhetoric, there was one idea that I thought merited further consideration. I'm not sure if I agree with it, but I think it's worth talking about. This guy said that the U.S. should annex Mexico and the other Central American countries, which he called "failed states". Since so many of these people seem to want to live in the United States, why not bring the United States to them? Although this proposal seems outrageous at first glance, and it's probably not going to happen, that's never stopped the intrepid scholars of the Beaglesonian Institute before.
No comments:
Post a Comment