If you replace the carrot with the stick in your plan we get the red
Chinese plan of last midcentury. Actually that worked out pretty
well I think. The guys who wrote freakonomics correlated the
legalization of abortion with slackening of crime twenty or so years
later. You were speaking of tube tying rather than abortion, but
either way we get a decrease in population which can only be a good
thing, for reasons you elucidated.
Of course, as you've said, something like this has zero chance of
ever happening because most people, besides us crackpots, would hate
it, but we're just a couple of old farts flapping out gums so what
the hell. I do prefer the carrot to the stick if we want this to
work, because I don't think we could pay people enough, and if you
made it voluntary I don't think enough people would sign up to make
any kind of difference.
There is religion, people join that voluntarily and in droves.
There were the shakers, but that points to a problem in keeping the
religion going. There were, and still are, monasteries and
nunneries, but I think there was a lot of fooling around going on in
them.
Is teen pregnancy a problem? haven't we always had pregnant teens?
I think you mean unwed teens, and more to the point, poor unwed
teens. Wait a minute, did you say consenting adults? So only
people above a certain age are eligible for the tube tying bonus?
That sounds a little strange. What if we just signed them up for
the pill? I think we already do that in a lot of cases.
But anyway, poor unwed teens, and maybe even poor wed teens, because
the problem is how can poor people raise kids. Murphy Brown can
give her kid whatever the kid wants and can send the kid to the
finest schools, and it doesn't even have to hurt her career because
she can afford daycare.
See the thing is it kind of comes down to the rich vs the poor. On
the other hand, as people rise into the middle class they begin to
have fewer kids. The kids don't die as much because healthcare is
available, and you don't need them to help on the family farm,
because likely they have moved off the family farm.
So they are deciding on the death penalty for that Boston guy and the
Colorado movie house guy. Basically I don't give a shit one way or the
other if they kill them or let them live out their lives in prison.
It always seemed a little odd to me that the left would be for abortion
and against capitol punishment, and the right the opposite. Always
seemed to be if you were for one you should be for the other.
Unlike the rest of my ilk I have never been that against the death
penalty, but with all these guys on death row turning out to be innocent
I have changed my mind. What is it all about? Do we want to punish
the bad people or cut down crime and make us decent citizens safer? A
little of both, some other reason?
I don't think we have ever discussed this before, have we?
No comments:
Post a Comment