I have a geography book from 1898 and it exemplifies the kind of
beliefs that were general at the time, and certainly the white race is the
pinnacle of evolution, and as you noted the asians are the next step up and the
blacks are at the bottom. This was when the Europeans were at the top of the
heap, with the northwest ones at the very tip top and the southern and eastern
ones, not quite lily white, a bit of off-white. Well nordic whites were at the
top of the heap then and pretty proud of themselves, and of course they were
writing the books.
Maybe I was too glib in saying these guys weren’t scientists. They
did generally have elevated academic positions and I think they wore those cool
white coats, and how is Joe Six Pack going to be able to tell that they weren’t
following the tenets of science?
Maybe I was a little too glib about the sociologists too. The
study of human behavior and of humans in groups is certainly a legitimate
study. But it’s also a really complicated one. Scientists can isolate a single
electron and determine its properties and then generalize that knowledge because
all electrons are exactly alike. But it’s hard to isolate a single person in a
group action and no humans are alike. Experiments are the life blood of
scientists, and it’s hard to do experiments on groups of people. There are
studies, but studies are very complex and they involve a bunch of math and
generally people major in something like sociology because they are no good at
math. And then there is the thing where nobody gets too excited over whether
the tip of the spaceship is made of tin or tungsten, but people get very excited
over whether the best solution is people working individually or in groups, and
the sociologist soon discovers his bread is buttered better if he sides with the
right or the left wing.
That racial antagonism, which of course is not really racial
because we are all of the same race, is basically us vs them, you see it with
Croatian vs Serb, Russian Ukrainian vs Ukrainian Russian, Crip vs Blood, Sox fan
vs Cub fan.
This whole thing about whether a thing is a sickness or not, is a
bunch of hooey. If you have measles I can take your blood and find the virus.
If you have diabetes I can see it in the composition of you blood. If you have
alcoholism I can only determine that by watching you in the tavern. There are
things that are really diseases and there are things that are just called that
for various reasons.
Alcoholism is called a disease to get a little sympathy for
alcoholics so that we treat them a little better, “Oh he is an alcoholic, he
can’t help himself,” and can more easily cure them, likewise calling mental
strangeness a disease is meant to make it a little more
sympathetic.
But calling it a disease is a double edged sword, because that also
implies that it should be treated, there is something wrong with that person and
they need to be changed. And generally people don’t want to be
changed.
And all those attempts to make gays straight, I don’t know if any
of them have ever worked, and most gays say they have been gays as long as they
can remember, and I don’t recall any point in my childhood where I could have
gone gay or straight and just happened to choose straight, and then there is the
fact that if it is voluntary why would you ever choose to be gay? So I think it
is probably something physical although nobody has ever found what it could
be.
But this question is political too. The right wingers want to
think it is a voluntary thing therefore they can make life harder on gays on the
theory that this will tend to make them more likely to decide to become
straight. The left wingers want to think it is involuntary, so there it is,
they can no more become straight than a black guy can become white, and so they
are just another minority, and you know how we lefties love
minorities.
And I think the AMA’s deciding it wasn’t a sickness was purely a
political move. When we all thought that gays were these sinister characters it
was popular to be against them, but now that we think they are all cute and
witty, it’s more popular to be for them.
No comments:
Post a Comment