If a politician has an agenda, that is a list of things he wants to
do, if he doesn't get elected he can't get any of it done. If he gives
some of it up to win the election he can still so some of the other
stuff, and hell he can still do some of the stuff he renounced to win
the election, he can just have some new revelation, he can evolve, a guy
that never changes his mind, is a guy who doesn't have much of a mind. People don't care much for politicians who change their mind, flip
floppers they are called by their opponents, of course they are called
that whether they actually flip flop or not.
Your man Rand was no flip flopper, I admired him for it, but I hated
the positions he wouldn't flip on, so I would never vote for him. I
hate to think that he could pull the wool over on a sharp guy like me,
but maybe if he said something like, maybe we should inspect medicines
to make sure they are not poison I would have voted for him. I reckon
Bernie has never flip-flopped, but I bet you would never vote for him.
My gal Hill flip flops all the time and it doesn't bother me, it's
mostly her hawkish attitude that I don't like. Trump flip flops all the
time, often several times in the course of the day, but through it all
he is always Trump. The reps and some of his own people have told him
to tone it down, but Trump wants to have fun. So there is a consistency
of some sort.
One wonders why one would lie about being an anarchist. They argued
all the time at the turn of the century, and I reckon they do to this
day. Just because somebody puts up an anarchist website doesn't mean
that all the anarchists deal with it. You wonder about that voluntary
cooperation thing. Cops are almost never around and yet usually people
are well-behaved, maybe we don't need any guys with stinking badges
hanging around.
There's some people. like ourselves of course, who are nice guys
through and through, and there are other guys who are nice guys because
they don't want to go to jail, and if you take the cops away they will
play. I think the theory is that like in communism, you can make the
new man by having a better political system, but who believes that shit?
I don't buy that social contract stuff where everybody got together
and said hey let's have a government to preserve our natural rights. I
think it's in our genes as social animals and beyond that gummints
started out simply as a bunch of strong men but as they took in more
people they had to be kind of nice to them to avoid being overthrown,
and maybe now they are about halfway inbetween as far as helping and
hurting people.
These libertarians, these cafeteria libertarians who normally just
like the part about cutting taxes, are like an albatross around the neck
of the True Party, because oh they are tiresome, they are generally
long winded, and a guy who steals your wallet is bad enough, but a guy
who keeps flapping his jaws while he does it, intolerable.
That's why I think Gary and Bill should call themselves 'Tarians!
They're hip and on the move, and are those joints hanging out the
corners of their mouths? Not that there is anything wrong with that.
You say you left the olde libertarians because you disagreed with
them on the second Iraq war, but that they turned out to be right on
that. Of course Rand was against all preemptive wars, so were they
right out being against all of them, or just on that particular one?
No comments:
Post a Comment