Very good internet research Beagles. That Santa Anna, I believe at some
point he lost his leg and it got mummified or something and went on to
have a little bit of a career itself. I'm not exactly sure of this and I
should do some internet research, but not this morning.
I think oil was the reason we got involved in the mideast in the first
place, well and Israel too of course. But maybe they overplayed their
hand because then people started drilling all over, and then we
discovered fracking and anymore we seem to have more oil and gas than we
know what to do with. Remember when energy independence was a big
campaign issue? As for foreign aid if we gave the Palestinians as much
as we give Israel there would be no Israel.
You know it's kind of hard to figure out how we got where we are in the
mideast right now, well how to figure out where we are. Well mostly we
are not there, we are this shadowy presence with drones and advisors and
shipping weapons here and there.
I've read a lot of articles about how to deal with what is going on over
there like that Lyons article. When you read the political guys they
always seem to have some plan, but when you get down to people who seem
to be more expert (they cite more historical stuff, they seem to be
taking many more factors into account), they are like, well we could go
in full bore with boots galore on the ground and surely we could defeat
ISIS and Al Qaeda and whoever, but then we would have to stay there and
rule with an iron fist, while taking potshots from them, until hell, and
the mideast freezes over.
I think this is our goal, Obama's goal, to just play that shadowy
presence, assassinate some guy here, sell some weapons there, keep the
whole thing at a low boil, keep it cheap with no big risks. And then up
pops ISIS, and these guys are really bad dudes and not only that but
they are holding land. Even so we stuck to our plan amped up the
rhetoric a bit, maybe gave more weapons to the Kurds. (The Kurds are
great, but they are not going to fight for an inch of land that won't
later become Kurdistan, and all the international coalition plans count
on Turkey who hates the Kurds.)
And then Paris. What the fuck? Well it's not us, and we are a lot
harder to infiltrate then France, although how hard can it be to do a
terror attack? Look at Timothy McVeigh. So we amp up the rhetoric and
the drones and whatever. And certainly if France wants at them let them
do it, but if we couldn't do it what can France do? I don't think I
have heard any talk about French boots on the ground.
Boots on the ground are the real issue, though the number depends on who
you talk to and when you talk to them. We have an election going on
right now, so all the candidates have a plan. Anybody that is not boots
on the ground has the same plan as Obama, only more of it, whatever
that means. Then you have the guys who say they'll listen to the
generals, but the generals are all military politicians or else they
wouldn't be generals, and they know that the path to greater success is
figuring out what the prez wants them to say.
I think we will have to watch the Russkies. I don't think we can make
the Ukraine deal because they want both and they are not giving up
either one, but that doesn't mean they will succeed.
And ISIS is no threat to the United States although the politicians will
tell you otherwise. They are an irritant and they certainly piss us
off, but we really should know now to stay out of the briar patch.
The best thing I've heard, and I believe, is to understand you enemy,
and these ISIS guys, I have a hard time understanding this, but I'll
give it a stab in the next post.
No comments:
Post a Comment