The Heart is a Lonely Hunter comes from the title of the book that the
movie is fairly well based on. It is by one of my favorite authors,
Carson McCullough, one of those southern women writers who are all so
good. She also wrote A Member of the Wedding which they made an award
winning movie out of.
Did you know Genghis Kahn was a Christian? He was a Nestorian Christian
one of those early offshoots that shot off east and then were kind of
lost to the central church. I don't think whatever brand of
Christianity he belonged to had much in common with the one that
occupied Europe when he sent his short legged horses running west. And I
don't really know for sure that he was any kind of Christian, it was
just something I read in a book about him.
Which I guess is the same thing you could say about Jesus, that you read
a book about him, which I maintain is just a pretty good book, not the
good book, and of course we don't really know for sure if he said what
those guys, who we are not even sure who they were, said he said.
So what does it even mean to believe in Christ since so many people who
claim to believe in him believe in entirely different things? Don't you
really have to say that you believe in the Christ defined by such and
such doctrines in order for your declaration to have any meaning? And
then if you aren't sure about Christ than you can't be sure of the
Christian god. You could become Jewish or Moslem or one of those odd
little sects like the Druze or the Yazidi. You could have your own
church of the Holy Church of Christ without Christ, like Hazel Motes in
Wise Blood written by Flannery O'Connor, another one of those great
southern women writers, and a pretty damn good movie too.
Or I suppose you could just choose any god at all, the world is full of
them. Or you could do like Rene Descartes, Beagles thinks therefore he
is, and start with the things you know for sure and work outwards
towards them. Of course Rene's quest led him right back to the bosom of
the Catholic Church so I don't know.
See and there you go again, a couple paragraphs down, after saying you
are not so sure about Jesus because he didn't come back in a few days
like he said he did, and you really can't be sure if he actually said
that, or said anything those unknown guys said he did, and then you are
referencing something he said. I think we have a misunderstanding when
you quote the bible. What most people mean when they say that the bible
says this or that, is that this is important and credible because the
bible says it. What I think you mean is just like this is something I
read somewhere, or heard somewhere or something, it's to be judged on
its own merit and not because of its source.
And I think I agree with what you are saying. We are always told to do
the good thing, always choose good over evil. Well duh. But the
problem is telling the difference between good and evil, and really the
best thing to do is to think it out to its consequences and choose the
act that leads to the best consequences. This puts you into the ends
justifies the means crowd that so many get up on their high horse and
decry, but in fact that is the way to go. I don't know why people even
argue about it.
I think that most of the trouble in the world comes from people doing
stupid things rather than evil things, and I think the evilest things
done are by people who think they are doing good.
No the meaning, that elusive thing, that, I don't know, thing that you
are thinking about when you lean out of your window into the rain and
sigh, that you sense sometimes in a book or a movie or a song, and it
almost seems like you can reach out and grab it, but it always slips out
of your grasp, is not of the things of this world, as nice as they are
no sammich or painting or garden can ever hold it.
See it's nice to think that there is something out there, not exactly of
this world, something bigger, maybe better, and it's nice to think you
have glimpsed it or rubbed shoulders with it, but if you ever did get
it, it would be a thing of this world, like the sammich the painting and
the garden, nice enough in their own way, but ordinary, not bigger, not
beyond. Part of its charm, maybe all of it, is that it can never be
grasped, and therein a sadness, but a sweet sadness, the sort of thing
that makes you sigh before you pull your head out of the rain.
Whatever that means.
No comments:
Post a Comment