Let’s start with the Islamic terrorists first. These are the guys
we are droning the fuck out of, bombing the snot out of them and their friends
and relatives and still they keep at it, so I think you can say one thing they
don’t understand is force.
Maybe bombing them is a good idea, maybe it is a bad idea, that is
not what I am arguing here, I am only arguing against the use of that misleading
phrase.
And you know lately there has been some furor over this new Iran
treaty. And maybe this is a good idea and maybe it isn’t, but there is a
certain crowd of wingnuts (and I don’t know if you are among them or not) who
are all pissed off because we are talking to the Iranis at all, so then how can
they say we tried diplomacy and it didn’t work when we don’t believe in talking
to people we don’t like.
Remember when Bill Maher caused that uproar because he criticized
the prez for calling the 9/11 fliers cowards? He said here are guys flying
airplanes into buildings knowing they are going to die, and our guys are sitting
in bunkers in the southwest pushing buttons and looking at video screens, so who
are the cowards here? Certainly he isn’t saying these guys aren't bad guys, he
is just saying that they are not cowards.
By the definition of cowards they aren’t, but people know it is an
insult and these are the bad guys so every insult should be piled on the enemy
and anybody who doesn’t think so must be an enemy themselves.
Language is how we communicate. If we pollute it by using abusive
and meaningless (and worst of all illogical) phrases, we are impairing our means
of communication. We are violating our sacred trust to provide a reasonable discussion among
reasonable people.
And what is this about stoning women to death for trying to get a
driver’s license? I don’t know if that particular offense ever happened, but I
will agree that they treat their women badly. See how much calmer and
more truthful my formulation is than yours, how much more amenable to reasonable
discussion?
Here is the thing, we did not go to war with them because they
treated their women badly. They treated their women badly all the time the USA
has been a nation, and they will do so long after we are gone, and we did not
attack them for that reason in the past and we will not in the
future.
Hijacking airplanes, bombing marketplaces, and beheading people,
these are the reasons we went to war with them, and they are all good reasons.
Why toss in that argument about women?
A lot of times when people are making a case they just pick out any
argument good or bad, and toss them all against a wall, figuring the more the
better. I think it’s more like building a dam, not that I know shit about
building a dam, but I think you have to be careful about what you put into it. If you put in crappy material you will just weaken the dam. If you include a
weak argument your opponent will attack you on those grounds, and since it’s a
weak argument he will tear you to shreds, and there you will be trying to defend
yourself by arguing an argument that you, yourself knew was weak, and all your
good strong arguments will sit on the side unmentioned. I don’t know why they
never let me on the Gage Park debate team? I was ready Jack.
I googled this Joseph P Swallow guy. It was a bit of work. I did
find an article in something called the Ironwood Gazette, or something like
that, but they wanted me to sign up to get any information, and I thought what
the hell, why am I doing this and not Beagles?
I think anecdotal info has it’s place in maybe illustrating a
point, or as a springboard for some logical argument, but otherwise I do not
like it at all.
I could just as well say some guy at the Ten Cat a few years ago
told me that the Russkies infiltrated northern Michigan and put something in the
water and now all the inhabitants there spout some kind of commie-inspired
gobbledygook that prevents reasonable discussion among reasonable Americans,
polluting their language and weakening America so that it will soon fall like a
ripe apple into the knapsack of the commissars. Ha ha ha, ha ha
ha.
Pretty sure that was what the guy was saying.
No comments:
Post a Comment