I reckon if you know what you like, you know what you need to know about
art. When I am speaking about art now I am including all kinds, music, writing,
movies, whatever. And I don’t want to make that distinction between whose an
artist and who is a performer, or entertainer, or illustrator. That’s pretty
much a matter of opinion, and no hard standards there.
There is a thing though, some people have their fingers to the wind. They
look about them and see what is selling, and they just try to copy that, and
some people who aren’t paying so much attention to that but just going with what
makes sense to them. I prefer the latter but there is probably a blend between
the two, everybody is a bit one and a bit of the other, and whose to know what
goes on in the minds of men?
And then there’s that horse thing. Somebody who is not familiar at all
with art, when shown several paintings, if they are a fan of horses they will
choose all the paintings that have horses in them. But then if you show them
only paintings that have horses in them and ask them to choose which of those
they like best, maybe they will choose the red horses, or the close-ups of
horses. And then when you show them only red horses, or only close ups of
horses, then they have to choose between which of them they like best and when
explaining why they prefer them they will have to take into account color and
line, and they will be on their way to being immersed in art. Similarly in
music. The first time you hear bluegrass it all sounds alike, but the more you
listen to different kinds the more you see what is going on.
And so your taste becomes a little more educated, you have preferences and
dislikes that you didn’t have before. Is this a good thing? Weren’t you just
as happy when you could just look at any picture of a horse or play that Earl
and Scruggs record over and over? Maybe I’m wrong, but I think the more you
know about something the deeper your enjoyment of it is.
Odd thing about music. Sometimes there is music and sometimes there is
music and words. The words have to have a certain cadence, but after that they
can mean anything. You could take the same melody (what is the word for the
song minus the words, you know I have a hard time understanding the words
applied to music) and you could put commie words to it and you could just as
easily make it a tea party jingle.
If you are singing it, I guess you have to pay attention to the meaning of
the words, you have to sound angry when the words are angry and sweet when they
are sweet, but what of the guitarist, does he change anything depending on how
the singer is singing? Just curious about that.
I guess I am wondering because the early Bob Dylan, who you liked, was
pretty lefty, and the later Bob Dylan, who you didn’t like, was more politically
neutral. Was it just a matter then of the words didn’t matter? I wonder if you
have listened to the latest Bob Dylan. He is not rock and roll anymore, he is
much closer to folk, to my ear anyway.
No comments:
Post a Comment